Hanbridge
2018 · MINI

MINI Cooper S

  • —Hood has cosmetic repaint with minor repair area noted
  • —No structural issues reported, negotiate for paint history
NEGOTIATE
confidence 0.86 · 1/3 verified

Customs and landed cost — quoted by a manager.

Open the car's garage ↗

Confirmed findings · 1

Hoodhigh · confidence 0.86

Filler under the paint

Inspector report: putty on hood — «косметический окрас капота с небольшим участком ремонтной работы»

voice «косметический окрас капота с небольшим участком ремонтной работы»

voice 0:00 «по капоту у нас сто восемьдесят один»

voice 0:15 «косметическому окрасу и небольшой участок ремонтной работы»

voice 0:30 «пиковые значения у нас до одного миллиметра»

gauge · 332 µmgauge · 332 µm

Verifier · Muse Spark Open
meta-models/muse-spark-open-1026: hood putty supported by 'ремонтной работы' jargon + 332µm and 1mm peaks; severity high vs evidence says 'небольшим участком' small area

Not confirmed · 2

Hoodmedium · confidence 0.81

Repainted

Hood: gauge display orange on the paint-gauge video (3–9s) — paint thicker than factory, likely repaint.

gauge · display colour band: elevatedgauge · display colour band: high

Verifier · Muse Spark Open
meta-models/muse-spark-open-1026: Hood gauge at 3-9s shows elevated/high band indicating thicker-than-factory paint consistent with repaint; severity/micron value not stated · single weak source (gauge screen colour, panel guessed from the frame) → needs voice/photo/inspector confirmation

Front left fenderhigh · confidence 0.76

Repainted

Front left fender: gauge display red on the paint-gauge video (54–57s) — paint thicker than factory, likely filler/body repair.

gauge · display colour band: high

Verifier · Muse Spark Open
meta-models/muse-spark-open-1026: Gauge shows red/high colour band on front_left_fender at 54-57s, indicating thicker-than-factory paint consistent with repaint/filler. · single weak source (gauge screen colour, panel guessed from the frame) → needs voice/photo/inspector confirmation

Listing photo · plate hidden

listing

How the agent worked · 19 steps

  1. index_photosMuse Glimmer0.1 s

    Open-weight triage: Muse Glimmer on our own GPU indexes every photo (view, whole car, panels)

    reused index built earlier by model=muse-glimmer-30b indexed=72 failed=1 wholeCar=3 views={"rear_left":10,"rear":5,"left":4,"front_left":8,"right":1,"front":4,"front_right":2,"interior":22,"detail":5,"engine":5,"underbod

  2. read_inspector_reportMuse Spark3.9 s

    Inspector text claims to cross-check vs photo/gauge

    claims=1 findings=1 rejectedQuotes=0

  3. transcribe_noteMuse Voice Transcribe + Muse Spark26.6 s

    Inspector voice: spoken gauge readings with verbatim quotes

    chunks=10 readings=11 findings=1 conflicts=roof paint={"hood":332,"front_right_fender":68,"front_right_door":71,"rear_right_fender":75,"trunk":85,"rear_left_fender":75,"front_left_door":75}

  4. read_gauge_videoMuse Spark70.8 s

    Gauge screen colour/digits cross-check against voice

    frames=50 measurements=9 findings=3 paint={}

  5. analyze_paint_readingsrules0.0 s

    Deterministic paint classification (≤150/151–220/>220 µm)

    readings=7 paintFindings=1: hood=332, front_right_fender=68, front_right_door=71, rear_right_fender=75, trunk=85, rear_left_fender=75, front_left_door=75

  6. estimate_landed_costmanager quote0.0 s

    Landed cost policy check (no invented numbers)

    {"status":"manager_quote_required"}

  7. find_defectsSAM 3.1 + Muse Spark5.1 s

    Spark defect scan on the SAM car crop

    view=rear panels=trunk,rear_bumper,roof defects=0: none

  8. find_defectsSAM 3.1 + Muse Spark6.3 s

    Spark defect scan on the SAM car crop

    view=rear_left panels=front_left_fender,front_left_door,rear_left_fender,trunk,rear_bumper,roof defects=0: none

  9. find_defectsSAM 3.1 + Muse Spark7.8 s

    Spark defect scan on the SAM car crop

    view=front_left panels=front_bumper,hood,front_left_fender,front_right_fender,front_left_door,roof defects=0: none

  10. make_listing_photoSAM 3.1 + Muse Image25.0 s

    Listing photo with plate hidden (never evidence)

    url=/generated/mini-cooper-s/photo_243132_0.jpg-listing.jpg plateHidden=true backgroundEdited=false vehicle_pixels_changed: meanDiff 19.52 > 10

  11. recheck_panelGlimmer index + SAM 3.1 + Muse Spark5.6 s

    Re-check decided by the agent: voice numbers show hood=332 (repaint) but gauge-screen colour absent (paint={}) and photos show no defects; single-source finding needs second source

    panel=hood photo=photo_243165_0.jpg (picked from Glimmer index) view=detail panelVisible=true onPanel=nothing visible

  12. recheck_panelGlimmer index + SAM 3.1 + Muse Spark7.4 s

    Re-check decided by the agent: voice transcribe flags conflicts=roof vs inspector text claims=1 vs photos show no defects; sources disagree about roof paint

    panel=roof photo=photo_243120_0.jpg (picked from Glimmer index) view=right panelVisible=false onPanel=nothing visible

  13. finalize_reportMuse Spark0.0 s

    Assemble verified report and verdict

    finalizing

  14. context_checkrules0.0 s

    roof: 159 µm but inspector says factory («есть у нас также завод, сто пятьдесят восемь», 75s) — numeric rule overridden, no finding

  15. verifierMuse Spark Open3.3 s

    hood/repaint supported=true conf=0.88 model=meta-models/muse-spark-open-1026

  16. verifierMuse Spark Open3.4 s

    front_left_fender/repaint supported=true conf=0.9 model=meta-models/muse-spark-open-1026

  17. verifierMuse Spark Open4.1 s

    hood/putty supported=true conf=0.89 model=meta-models/muse-spark-open-1026

  18. conflict_checkrules0.0 s

    hood/repaint: screen colour only → unconfirmed

  19. conflict_checkrules0.0 s

    front_left_fender/repaint: screen colour only → unconfirmed

Ask the expert

Ask a question — the answer is built from this report only.